January 2, 2008

• “I would hold Musharaf responsible,” Bhutto wrote…

  “Thus, they ordered the removal of Bhutto in order to
  carry on happily with the War on Terror hoax with its lucrative
  military ware and technology deals numbering in the trillions of
  dollars, with Wall Street rulers and stockholders feasting on the fat
  pork of the military-industrial-media-Congressional complex. This also
  may give the USA an excuse to intervene and “contain” Pakistan, which
  would mean that they would then have Iran completely surrounded. The
  pretext would be that Pakistan’s nuclear bombs are not in “safe” hands.

  Political
  assassinations have always been a part of life. Sometimes it is done
  for purely domestic political reasons. Sometimes it is done just for
  the thrill of it. However, the death of Benazir Bhutto has
  repercussions that extend far beyond Pakistani domestic politics and it
  is for this reason that one should be skeptical about who is
  “officially” being blamed. More importantly, one should also look at
  the political gain that those who are doing the finger pointing could
  expect to receive as a result of making such accusations. Who benefits
  from this situation? “

  

  Any
  time you hear the corporate news media mention “al-Qaeda,” it is just
  as in Orwell’s 1984 when the telescreens would have their “Two Minutes
  Hate,”

  
  

  • 9:22 pm
  • 2 Comments